[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205151414210.1656@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com, paul@...lmenage.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...k.pl, nacc@...ibm.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, tj@...nel.org, mschmidt@...hat.com,
berrange@...hat.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, liuj97@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] cpusets, suspend: Save and restore cpusets during
suspend/resume
On Tue, 15 May 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Why can't we leave cpuset.cpus unaltered for all cpusets during suspend?
>
> We can, that's what Srivatsa is going to make. The only thing I object
> to is the !suspend hotplug case.
>
Srivatsa is going to do that in another patchset in addition to this one?
We shouldn't need to store any old cpumask at all, just allow cpuset.cpus
to be a superset of online cpus during s/r and don't touch cpusets at all
since the cpus, as you said, are guaranteed to come back.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists