[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201205161209.03985.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:09:03 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rjw@...k.pl, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, olof@...om.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Emma Mobile GPIO driver V2
On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > irq_domain_add_legacy() exists for existing static ranges, which there is
> > really no reason to be adding in new board/platform support. You don't
> > have to worry about virq overlap since irq_create_mapping() already wraps
> > on top of irq_alloc_desc_xxx() for lookup.
>
> So I intentionally made use of the legacy domain in the non-DT case.
> This because I want to let the SoC code set the static IRQ ranges via
> platform data.
I think it's generally better to use just one code path for both cases,
if you need both DT and non-DT support, which means you would always
use irq_domain_add_legacy. Once you have the final patch to convert it
to DT, you can remove the legacy domain and just convert it to linear.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists