[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANqRtoT5g7zttqp6Nw58O=Xvo+hPKsBhZGXW_UGutKVh2-SD9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 00:47:17 +0900
From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rjw@...k.pl, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, olof@...om.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Emma Mobile GPIO driver V2
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Magnus Damm wrote:
>> > irq_domain_add_legacy() exists for existing static ranges, which there is
>> > really no reason to be adding in new board/platform support. You don't
>> > have to worry about virq overlap since irq_create_mapping() already wraps
>> > on top of irq_alloc_desc_xxx() for lookup.
>>
>> So I intentionally made use of the legacy domain in the non-DT case.
>> This because I want to let the SoC code set the static IRQ ranges via
>> platform data.
>
> I think it's generally better to use just one code path for both cases,
> if you need both DT and non-DT support, which means you would always
> use irq_domain_add_legacy. Once you have the final patch to convert it
> to DT, you can remove the legacy domain and just convert it to linear.
Sure, I don't mind that at all - it will make the DT bits even easier.
Thanks,
/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists