[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337187503.6724.50.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:58:23 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Dmitry Antipov <dmitry.antipov@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Perf record format portability
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 11:59 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Was the kernel trace events infrastructure designed with that in
> mind? I.e. cross analysis? I must be missing something here, still
> ENOCOFFEE :-\
Yes, the libparsevents library was design for this from day one. That's
why trace-cmd data file can be run on an ARM and read on x86, or PPC, or
whatever. I did all my development testing against 32bit, 64bit and big
and little endian. This was the case from the beginning.
-- Steve
>
> When doing cross arch event analisys I tested:
>
> PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE = 0,
> PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE = 1,
> PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE = 3,
>
> Not:
>
> PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT = 2,
> PERF_TYPE_RAW = 4,
> PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT = 5,
>
> - Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists