[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120516100121.3be6d0ca@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:01:21 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: "Andrew Stiegmann (stieg)" <astiegmann@...are.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acking@...are.com, dtor@...are.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dsouders@...are.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cschamp@...are.com
Subject: Re: [vmw_vmci RFC 01/11] Apply VMCI context code
On Tue, 15 May 2012 08:06:58 -0700
"Andrew Stiegmann (stieg)" <astiegmann@...are.com> wrote:
> Context code maintains state for vmci and allows the driver
> to communicate with multiple VMs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Stiegmann (stieg) <astiegmann@...are.com>
Running checkpatch reveals the usual noise, and the following that
should be addressed.
ERROR: do not use C99 // comments
#272: FILE: drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:183:
+static bool ctx_exists_locked(uint32_t cid) // IN
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
#304: FILE: drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:215:
+ uid_t * user, struct vmci_ctx **outContext)
I don't mind the C99 style comments, but the // IN convention
is pretty useless and should be removed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists