[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120516170124.GA21275@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:01:24 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] floppy: convert to delayed work and single-thread wq
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:36:51AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> +static struct workqueue_struct *floppy_wq;
> +
> static struct floppy_struct *_floppy = floppy_type;
> static unsigned char current_drive;
> static long current_count_sectors;
> @@ -629,16 +631,15 @@ static inline void set_debugt(void) { }
> static inline void debugt(const char *func, const char *msg) { }
> #endif /* DEBUGT */
>
> -typedef void (*timeout_fn)(unsigned long);
> -static DEFINE_TIMER(fd_timeout, floppy_shutdown, 0, 0);
>
> +static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(fd_timeout, floppy_shutdown);
> static const char *timeout_message;
There's no need to create a separate workqueue for this. There's just
single work item which shouldn't be executed concurrently on different
CPUs, right? Just queueing the work item onto system_nrt_wq should be
enough.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists