[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120516213701.GD25397@amt.cnet>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:01 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] kvm: host side for eoi optimization
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:07:58PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > not be called in above scenario.
>
> I think I see. So this shall fix it also makes code cleaner
> (no -2 hack). Right? kvm_apic_has_interrupt is called correct?
Yes, but its used by multiple callsites. Best to unify it (both setting
and clearing) in KVM_REQ_EVENT processing before guest entry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists