[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201205170037.34305.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 00:37:34 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Emma Mobile GPIO driver V2
On Thursday, May 17, 2012, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Do you guys have any preferences how to merge this?
> >> >
> >> > Can I include it together with the EMEV2 SoC bits perhaps? That may be
> >> > easy so we can keep track of the platform data header file dependency.
> >>
> >> For ux500 I made a special "gpio and pins" branch and sent through ARM SoC.
> >
> > The problem is we have a patch depending on the $subject one in the EMEV2
> > series and it would be better to keep them both together if that's not
> > a big deal.
>
> Dependencies are fine, as long as they are not circular. You can
> either pull in the gpio/pins branch into the EMEV2 branch, or base it
> on it.
I guess I'll try to merge the gpio/pins into the EMEV2 branch.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists