linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] input: rotary: Init wake according to platform pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 May 2012 23:51:41 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	"Zhang, Sonic" <Sonic.Zhang@...log.com>
Cc:	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org" 
	<uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
	Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: rotary: Init wake according to platform pm_wakeup
 flag.

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 02:32:37AM -0400, Zhang, Sonic wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@...il.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 2:08 PM
> >To: Zhang, Sonic
> >Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org; LKML; uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org;
> >Bob Liu
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: rotary: Init wake according to platform pm_wakeup
> >flag.
> >
> >On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:58:00PM -0400, Zhang, Sonic wrote:
> >> Hi Dmitry,
> >>
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@...il.com]
> >> >Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 2:31 AM
> >> >To: Zhang, Sonic
> >> >Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org; LKML; uclinux-dist-
> >devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
> >> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: rotary: Init wake according to platform pm_wakeup
> >> >flag.
> >> >
> >> >Hi Sonic,
> >> >
> >> >On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:36:23PM +0800, sonic.zhang@...log.com wrote:
> >> >> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> Rotary can't be used as a wakeup source in all Blackfin processors.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  drivers/input/misc/bfin_rotary.c |    2 +-
> >> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/bfin_rotary.c b/drivers/input/misc/bfin_rotary.c
> >> >> index 1c4146f..bb1971c 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/input/misc/bfin_rotary.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/bfin_rotary.c
> >> >> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int __devinit bfin_rotary_probe(struct
> >> >platform_device *pdev)
> >> >>      bfin_write_CNT_CONFIG(bfin_read_CNT_CONFIG() | CNTE);
> >> >>
> >> >>      platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rotary);
> >> >> -    device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
> >> >> +    device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, pdata->pm_wakeup);
> >> >
> >> >I do not see pm_wakeup in bfin_rotary_platform_data.
> >>
> >> The patch against the bfin_rotary.h under blackfin architecture folder will be sent
> >out soon by Bob Liu.
> >
> >This split makes no sense - if I apply your patch to my tree it menas
> >that my tree will be broken on blackfin architecture until blackfin arch
> >gets pulled into mainline and I do next merge (around 3.5-rc3??). Please
> >combine both patches and get both pieces applied at the same time.
> >
> 
> The rotary Blackfin architecture patch is on top of the new bf60x
> machine patch sets. You may fail to apply it before the bf60x patches
> are merged.  Is it better to send you this patch later after you do
> next merge?

You may also add

	Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>

to this patch and merge it through blackfin tree.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/