[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB5D80B.8060000@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:03:07 +0800
From: Nai Xia <nai.xia@...il.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] refault distance-based file cache sizing
On 2012年05月17日 21:11, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 01:25 AM, nai.xia wrote:
>> Hi Johannes,
>>
>> Just out of curiosity(since I didn't study deep into the
>> reclaiming algorithms), I can recall from here that around 2005,
>> there was an(or some?) implementation of the "Clock-pro" algorithm
>> which also have the idea of "reuse distance", but it seems that algo
>> did not work well enough to get merged?
>
> The main issue with clock-pro was scalability.
>
> Johannes has managed to take the good parts of clock-pro,
> and add it on top of our split lru VM, which lets us keep
> the scalability, while still being able to deal with file
> faults from beyond the inactive list.
>
Hmm, I see. Thanks for the reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists