| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4FB665B8.8000300@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:07:36 -0400 From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> To: nai.xia@...il.com CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] refault distance-based file cache sizing On 05/17/2012 11:44 PM, Nai Xia wrote: > But I do think that Clock-pro deserves its credit, since after all > it's that research work firstly brought the idea of "refault/reuse > distance" to the kernel community. The ARC people did that, too. > Further more, it's also good > to let the researchers and the community to together have some > brain-storm of this problem if it's really hard to deal with in > reality. How much are researchers interested in the real world constraints that OS developers have to deal with? Often scalability is as much of a goal as being good at selecting the right page to replace... -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists