[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337340263.573.31.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:24:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add persistent event facilities
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 13:03 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > - you allow an arbitrary place in debugfs; this might make finding
> > them 'interesting'. Should we put them all in the same place?
>
> My take on this is that we want to be able to make the same events we
> have now, persistent. Basically not trace for the duration of a child
> process but in a process-agnostic way, system-wide.
This would argue against per-task persistent events..
> In that case, we probably want to be able to mark events as persistent,
> maybe add another node in debugfs:
>
> (debugfs)/tracing/events/mce/mce_record/attr
>
> which can be used for flags or whatever, or something to that effect...
( while mce is a user of persistent events, it seems to me in general
persistent events should not be related to mce )
However you raise a valid point about keeping track of what events are
spooled into that buffer.
Note the plural there, it might be very desirable to allow multiple
events into a single persistent buffer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists