[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120518115957.GB19785@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:59:57 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add persistent event facilities
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 13:03 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > - you allow an arbitrary place in debugfs; this might make finding
> > > them 'interesting'. Should we put them all in the same place?
> >
> > My take on this is that we want to be able to make the same events we
> > have now, persistent. Basically not trace for the duration of a child
> > process but in a process-agnostic way, system-wide.
>
> This would argue against per-task persistent events..
Yeah, 'persistency' is something that's per CPU at minimum.
> Note the plural there, it might be very desirable to allow
> multiple events into a single persistent buffer.
very, very, very much so. One (per CPU) buffer, with many events
multiplexed into it.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists