[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337342245-23154-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 17:27:25 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
<lrg@...com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: fixed build error
Some of the api calls are not changed and it leads
to following build error:
/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c: In function 'tps65910_enable':
/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c:491:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'tps65910_set_bits'
/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c: In function 'tps65910_disable':
/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c:504:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'tps65910_clear_bits'
/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c: In function 'tps65910_get_voltage':
/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c:628:2: warning: passing argument 1 of
'tps65910_reg_read' from incompatible pointer type]
/linux/mfd/tps65910.h:856:19: note: expected 'struct tps65910 *' but
argument is of type 'struct tps65910_reg *'
/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c:628:2: error: too few arguments to
function 'tps65910_reg_read'
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
---
This patch fixes the compilation error in Samuel's tree and should go
through Samuel's for-next.
Some of the function is removed from the regulator for-next and so error
in line number 491 and 504 will not be there but still error at 628 will
be there.
drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
index b38fb64..852b05b 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int tps65910_enable(struct regulator_dev *dev)
if (reg < 0)
return reg;
- return tps65910_set_bits(mfd, reg, TPS65910_SUPPLY_STATE_ENABLED);
+ return tps65910_reg_set_bits(mfd, reg, TPS65910_SUPPLY_STATE_ENABLED);
}
static int tps65910_disable(struct regulator_dev *dev)
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static int tps65910_disable(struct regulator_dev *dev)
if (reg < 0)
return reg;
- return tps65910_clear_bits(mfd, reg, TPS65910_SUPPLY_STATE_ENABLED);
+ return tps65910_reg_clear_bits(mfd, reg, TPS65910_SUPPLY_STATE_ENABLED);
}
static int tps65910_enable_time(struct regulator_dev *dev)
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static int tps65910_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *dev)
if (reg < 0)
return reg;
- value = tps65910_reg_read(pmic, reg);
+ value = tps65910_reg_read_locked(pmic, reg);
if (value < 0)
return value;
--
1.7.1.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists