| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1337358773-6919-20-git-send-email-mchehab@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:32:06 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH EDAC v26 19/66] i7300_edac: convert driver to use the new edac ABI
The legacy edac ABI is going to be removed. Port the driver to use
and benefit from the new API functionality.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
---
drivers/edac/i7300_edac.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i7300_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i7300_edac.c
index d6f3a2d..dfeb44b 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/i7300_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/i7300_edac.c
@@ -464,17 +464,14 @@ static void i7300_process_fbd_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
FERR_FAT_FBD, error_reg);
snprintf(pvt->tmp_prt_buffer, PAGE_SIZE,
- "FATAL (Branch=%d DRAM-Bank=%d %s "
- "RAS=%d CAS=%d Err=0x%lx (%s))",
- branch, bank,
- is_wr ? "RDWR" : "RD",
- ras, cas,
- errors, specific);
-
- /* Call the helper to output message */
- edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue(mci, rank, branch << 1,
- (branch << 1) + 1,
- pvt->tmp_prt_buffer);
+ "Bank=%d RAS=%d CAS=%d Err=0x%lx (%s))",
+ bank, ras, cas, errors, specific);
+
+ edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_FATAL, mci, 0, 0, 0,
+ branch, -1, rank,
+ is_wr ? "Write error" : "Read error",
+ pvt->tmp_prt_buffer, NULL);
+
}
/* read in the 1st NON-FATAL error register */
@@ -513,23 +510,14 @@ static void i7300_process_fbd_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
/* Form out message */
snprintf(pvt->tmp_prt_buffer, PAGE_SIZE,
- "Corrected error (Branch=%d, Channel %d), "
- " DRAM-Bank=%d %s "
- "RAS=%d CAS=%d, CE Err=0x%lx, Syndrome=0x%08x(%s))",
- branch, channel,
- bank,
- is_wr ? "RDWR" : "RD",
- ras, cas,
- errors, syndrome, specific);
-
- /*
- * Call the helper to output message
- * NOTE: Errors are reported per-branch, and not per-channel
- * Currently, we don't know how to identify the right
- * channel.
- */
- edac_mc_handle_fbd_ce(mci, rank, channel,
- pvt->tmp_prt_buffer);
+ "DRAM-Bank=%d RAS=%d CAS=%d, Err=0x%lx (%s))",
+ bank, ras, cas, errors, specific);
+
+ edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED, mci, 0, 0,
+ syndrome,
+ branch >> 1, channel % 2, rank,
+ is_wr ? "Write error" : "Read error",
+ pvt->tmp_prt_buffer, NULL);
}
return;
}
@@ -807,13 +795,17 @@ static int i7300_init_csrows(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
for (ch = 0; ch < MAX_CH_PER_BRANCH; ch++) {
int channel = to_channel(ch, branch);
- dinfo = &pvt->dimm_info[slot][channel];
+ dimm = EDAC_DIMM_PTR(mci->layers, mci->dimms,
+ mci->n_layers, branch, ch, slot);
- dimm = mci->csrows[slot].channels[branch * MAX_CH_PER_BRANCH + ch].dimm;
+ dinfo = &pvt->dimm_info[slot][channel];
mtr = decode_mtr(pvt, slot, ch, branch,
dinfo, dimm);
+ mci->tot_dimms++;
+ dimm++;
+
/* if no DIMMS on this row, continue */
if (!MTR_DIMMS_PRESENT(mtr))
continue;
@@ -1034,10 +1026,8 @@ static int __devinit i7300_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
+ struct edac_mc_layer layers[3];
struct i7300_pvt *pvt;
- int num_channels;
- int num_dimms_per_channel;
- int num_csrows;
int rc;
/* wake up device */
@@ -1054,22 +1044,17 @@ static int __devinit i7300_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
if (PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn) != 0)
return -ENODEV;
- /* As we don't have a motherboard identification routine to determine
- * actual number of slots/dimms per channel, we thus utilize the
- * resource as specified by the chipset. Thus, we might have
- * have more DIMMs per channel than actually on the mobo, but this
- * allows the driver to support up to the chipset max, without
- * some fancy mobo determination.
- */
- num_dimms_per_channel = MAX_SLOTS;
- num_channels = MAX_CHANNELS;
- num_csrows = MAX_SLOTS * MAX_CHANNELS;
-
- debugf0("MC: %s(): Number of - Channels= %d DIMMS= %d CSROWS= %d\n",
- __func__, num_channels, num_dimms_per_channel, num_csrows);
-
/* allocate a new MC control structure */
- mci = edac_mc_alloc(sizeof(*pvt), num_csrows, num_channels, 0);
+ layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_BRANCH;
+ layers[0].size = MAX_BRANCHES;
+ layers[0].is_virt_csrow = false;
+ layers[1].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL;
+ layers[1].size = MAX_CH_PER_BRANCH;
+ layers[1].is_virt_csrow = true;
+ layers[2].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_SLOT;
+ layers[2].size = MAX_SLOTS;
+ layers[2].is_virt_csrow = true;
+ mci = new_edac_mc_alloc(0, ARRAY_SIZE(layers), layers, sizeof(*pvt));
if (mci == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists