| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1337358773-6919-14-git-send-email-mchehab@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:32:00 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Thompson <norsk5@...oo.com>
Subject: [PATCH EDAC v26 13/66] e7xxx_edac: convert driver to use the new edac ABI
The legacy edac ABI is going to be removed. Port the driver to use
and benefit from the new API functionality.
Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@...oo.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
---
drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c
index 709aca2..d4cfc24 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@
* Based on work by Dan Hollis <goemon at anime dot net> and others.
* http://www.anime.net/~goemon/linux-ecc/
*
+ * Datasheet:
+ * http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/chipsets/e7501-chipset-memory-controller-hub-datasheet.html
+ *
* Contributors:
* Eric Biederman (Linux Networx)
* Tom Zimmerman (Linux Networx)
@@ -71,7 +74,7 @@
#endif /* PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_7505_1_ERR */
#define E7XXX_NR_CSROWS 8 /* number of csrows */
-#define E7XXX_NR_DIMMS 8 /* FIXME - is this correct? */
+#define E7XXX_NR_DIMMS 8 /* 2 channels, 4 dimms/channel */
/* E7XXX register addresses - device 0 function 0 */
#define E7XXX_DRB 0x60 /* DRAM row boundary register (8b) */
@@ -216,13 +219,15 @@ static void process_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct e7xxx_error_info *info)
row = edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page(mci, page);
/* convert syndrome to channel */
channel = e7xxx_find_channel(syndrome);
- edac_mc_handle_ce(mci, page, 0, syndrome, row, channel, "e7xxx CE");
+ edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED, mci, page, 0, syndrome,
+ row, channel, -1, "e7xxx CE", "", NULL);
}
static void process_ce_no_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
debugf3("%s()\n", __func__);
- edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info(mci, "e7xxx CE log register overflow");
+ edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, -1,
+ "e7xxx CE log register overflow", "", NULL);
}
static void process_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct e7xxx_error_info *info)
@@ -236,13 +241,17 @@ static void process_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct e7xxx_error_info *info)
/* FIXME - should use PAGE_SHIFT */
block_page = error_2b >> 6; /* convert to 4k address */
row = edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page(mci, block_page);
- edac_mc_handle_ue(mci, block_page, 0, row, "e7xxx UE");
+
+ edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci, block_page, 0, 0,
+ row, -1, -1, "e7xxx UE", "", NULL);
}
static void process_ue_no_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
debugf3("%s()\n", __func__);
- edac_mc_handle_ue_no_info(mci, "e7xxx UE log register overflow");
+
+ edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, -1,
+ "e7xxx UE log register overflow", "", NULL);
}
static void e7xxx_get_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
@@ -413,6 +422,7 @@ static int e7xxx_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dev_idx)
{
u16 pci_data;
struct mem_ctl_info *mci = NULL;
+ struct edac_mc_layer layers[2];
struct e7xxx_pvt *pvt = NULL;
u32 drc;
int drc_chan;
@@ -423,8 +433,21 @@ static int e7xxx_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dev_idx)
pci_read_config_dword(pdev, E7XXX_DRC, &drc);
drc_chan = dual_channel_active(drc, dev_idx);
- mci = edac_mc_alloc(sizeof(*pvt), E7XXX_NR_CSROWS, drc_chan + 1, 0);
-
+ /*
+ * According with the datasheet, this device has a maximum of
+ * 4 DIMMS per channel, either single-rank or dual-rank. So, the
+ * total amount of dimms is 8 (E7XXX_NR_DIMMS).
+ * That means that the DIMM is mapped as CSROWs, and the channel
+ * will map the rank. So, an error to either channel should be
+ * attributed to the same dimm.
+ */
+ layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT;
+ layers[0].size = E7XXX_NR_CSROWS;
+ layers[0].is_virt_csrow = true;
+ layers[1].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL;
+ layers[1].size = drc_chan + 1;
+ layers[1].is_virt_csrow = false;
+ mci = new_edac_mc_alloc(0, ARRAY_SIZE(layers), layers, sizeof(*pvt));
if (mci == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists