lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 19 May 2012 23:26:00 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	"lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: use correct device for device supply
 lookup

On Saturday 19 May 2012 11:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:50:54PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> Am I missing anything here in understanding?
> I certainly am.  Please go back to square one: what's the problem you
> are seeing here?  Then go forward and step by step relate it to the code
> change.

Sorry again for not clearing the things.
Here is my connection:
There is two rail V1 and V2. V2 is supplied by V1. There is some devices 
on V1 and V2.
V1---->V2-----device-v2-1
      |------------------device-v1-1

Now I make the dts as:
v1_reg: v1@0 {
     regulator-name="v1";
   :::::::::::
};

v2_reg: v2@1 {
     regulator-name="v2";
     v2-supply=<&v1_reg>;
::::::::::::::
}


Now when registering the v1, I am setting init_data->input_supply = NULL 
and reg_desc->supply_name = NULL;
Config->of_node is the node for v1_reg;
dev->of_node is NULL as it is mfd sub device driver tps65910-pmic.

So registration went fine.

When registering the V2, I am setting init_data->input_supply = NULL and 
reg_desc->supply_name = v2.
config->of_node is node for v2_reg;
dev->of_node is NULL as it is mfd sub device driver tps65910-pmic.

At the time of registration,  as becasue there is valid 
reg_desc->supply_name and hence it tries to lookup the entry for 
<name>-supply i.e. v2-supply in this case for getting regulator_dev.
regulator_register() {
:::::::::::
       if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
                 supply = init_data->supply_regulator;
         else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
                 supply = regulator_desc->supply_name;

         if (supply) {
                 struct regulator_dev *r;

                 r = regulator_dev_lookup(dev, supply, &ret);
::::::::::::::::::::::::
}

static struct regulator_dev *regulator_dev_lookup(struct device *dev,
                                                   const char *supply,
                                                   int *ret)
{
         /* first do a dt based lookup */
----> Checked here, dev is not null but dev->of_node is null.
         if (dev && dev->of_node) {

------------>The issue is that I am not getting here as dev->node is 
null here.

                 node = of_get_regulator(dev, supply);
                 if (node) {

         }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ