linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86: Define early read-mostly per-cpu macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120521122859.GA17065@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2012 14:28:59 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Vlad Zolotarov <vlad@...lemp.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Shai Fultheim (Shai@...leMP.com)" <Shai@...lemp.com>,
	Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86: Define early read-mostly per-cpu macros


* Vlad Zolotarov <vlad@...lemp.com> wrote:

> On Monday, May 21, 2012 10:46:26 AM Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Vlad Zolotarov <vlad@...lemp.com> wrote:
> > > Some read-mostly per-cpu data may need to be declared or defined early,
> > > so it can be initialized and accessed before per_cpu areas are
> > > allocated.
> > > 
> > > Only the data that resides in the per_cpu areas should be read-mostly,
> > > as there is little benefit in optimizing cache lines on initialization.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vlad@...lemp.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shai Fultheim <shai@...lemp.com>
> > 
> > That's not a valid signoff chain. If you send me a patch then
> > you should be the last SOB - but as the author you should be the
> > first SOB as well. I edited the two SOBs to be Acked-by's.
> 
> Thanks, Ingo. I understand. However the "history" of this 
> patch is not as simple as u represent. ;)
> 
> It was originally written by Ido and I just posted it (then I 
> put my SOB at the end of SOB list). But after u noted that it 
> didn't compile on !SMP i reworked it but yet Ido did at least 
> half of the coding, so I put my SOB at the first place (as I 
> was the last one writing the code) and then Ido's as he 
> actually wrote the code in this patch as well and I do wanted 
> to give him a credit.

The proper way to do that is to add a "Originally-From: " tag, 
or to keep him as the author (and first SOB) and desccribe your 
own changes as comments between the SOBs:

 Signed-off-by: Original Author
 [ cleaned up the code a bit ]
 Signed-off-by: Second Author
 [ restructured it ]
 Signed-off-by: You

> Do u still think changing his (Ido's) SOB to Acked-by was the 
> right thing to do?

If they agree with it then you can send it to me that way - or 
the above way, or you can add any extra authors in a copyright 
notice - but the signoff chain should be a chain, with the 
primary author as the first SOB and the person sending me the 
patch being the last SOB.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/