[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d35x5ank.fsf_-_@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:20:31 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@...labs.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: [PATCH] pidns: Guarantee that the pidns init will be the last pidns process reaped. v2
Today we have a two-fold bug. Sometimes release_task on pid == 1 in a
pid namespace can run before other processes in a pid namespace have had
release task called. With the result that pid_ns_release_proc can be
called before the last proc_flus_task() is done using
upid->ns->proc_mnt, resulting in the use of a stale pointer. This same
set of circumstances can lead to waitpid(...) returning for a processes
started with clone(CLONE_NEWPID) before the every process in the pid
namespace has actually exited.
To fix this modify zap_pid_ns_processess wait until all other processes
in the pid namespace have exited, even EXIT_DEAD zombies.
The delay_group_leader and related tests ensure that the thread gruop
leader will be the last thread of a process group to be reaped, or to
become EXIT_DEAD and self reap. With the change to zap_pid_ns_processes
we get the guarantee that pid == 1 in a pid namespace will be the last
task that release_task is called on.
With pid == 1 being the last task to pass through release_task
pid_ns_release_proc can no longer be called too early nor can wait
return before all of the EXIT_DEAD tasks in a pid namespace have exited.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
Andrew can you replace your earlier version of this patch in your tree
with this one, after Oleg takes a look at it. I think this is about
as simple and maintainable and obvious as we can make this bug fix.
kernel/exit.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
kernel/pid_namespace.c | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index d8bd3b42..abc4fc0 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -64,15 +64,26 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk);
static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead)
{
nr_threads--;
- detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID);
if (group_dead) {
+ struct task_struct *parent;
+
detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID);
detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_SID);
list_del_rcu(&p->tasks);
list_del_init(&p->sibling);
__this_cpu_dec(process_counts);
+
+ /* If we are the last child process in a pid namespace
+ * to be reaped notify the child_reaper.
+ */
+ parent = p->real_parent;
+ if ((task_active_pid_ns(p)->child_reaper == parent) &&
+ list_empty(&parent->children) &&
+ (parent->flags & PF_EXITING))
+ wake_up_process(parent);
}
+ detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID);
list_del_rcu(&p->thread_group);
}
diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
index b98b0ed..ba1cbb8 100644
--- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c
+++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
@@ -189,6 +189,17 @@ void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
rc = sys_wait4(-1, NULL, __WALL, NULL);
} while (rc != -ECHILD);
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ for (;;) {
+ __set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (list_empty(¤t->children))
+ break;
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ schedule();
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ }
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+
if (pid_ns->reboot)
current->signal->group_exit_code = pid_ns->reboot;
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists