linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/5] perf tools: Minimalistic build without libelf dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87aa112hid.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 May 2012 09:20:42 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] perf tools: Minimalistic build without libelf dependency

Hi, David

On Mon, 21 May 2012 09:03:19 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> One idea that has been proposed is to make perf configurable - to pick
> and choose which pieces you want built-in. For example for target
> systems only compile in record command. It seems like that part should
> be done first and would potentially handle a lot of these changes.
>

Yeah, I remember Arnaldo said about the menuconfig-like configuration
interface. But I'd like to finish this minimal build patchset first
since the configuration change can require much work on where I'm not
familiar with and I doubt the users care about it much.

Anyway, thanks for the comment.
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/