[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBBA094.3090703@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 17:20:04 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: NMI vs #PF clash
On 05/22/2012 05:09 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> >
>> > Or we could just have the NMI always restore the cr2 register.
>>
>> IMO that's best.
>
> OK, I can whip up a patch, but I wont push that in till 3.6.
>
Thanks. Something I've noticed is that writing cr2 is slow, so you may
want to write it only if it has changed (which should be very rare).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists