linux-kernel - Re: 3.4+ dcache BUG.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzYd9b4CF30vK+rT_daKLXKBd7kOpsOZtoPKcDnsgYAxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2012 18:58:05 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.4+ dcache BUG.

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>        BUG_ON(nd->inode != dentry->d_inode);

I'm going to assume it's the exact same thing (and thus hopefully
fixed by the revert that I just pushed out), but now I'm really
curious what your load is, since you seem to recreate this so easily.
I ran with that patch for weeks.

But I suspect my issue is that while I tested lots of concurrent
lookups, I don't run into low-memory situations.

                    Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/