[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120522020825.GA22961@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 22:08:25 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.4+ dcache BUG.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:51:51PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Just hit this. Probably related to todays dcache changes ?
>
> Almost certainly. Except:
>
> > I'm not sure why, but the dcache.c line numbers don't match up..
> > This kernel was v3.3-rc7-14528-g29db10d which looked like..
>
> You seem to not have fetched any tags lately (so it says "3.3-rc7 +
> 14528 commits" instead of something more relevant), and I can't make
> sense of that SHA1 either (29db10d) either.
>
> You probably have other changes in your tree as well, explaining the
> SHA1 that I don't recognize?
ah, yeah. Mostly just stuff like removing noisy printk's that I get
tired of seeing when I run trinity.
> What was the load that triggered this? Just a regular kernel compile?
kernel build doing make -j 64 on a 8 way machine. (quad core with ht)
(It has a really fast ssd, so it can really churn through builds quickly).
> I see the "comm: cc1" there, and I'm a bit surprised, since I ran
> those patches here locally a *lot*. Is this perhaps some low-memory
> scenario?
hmm, that's a possibility. Machine has 4GB, but with all those gcc/ld's flying around,
maybe when it gets to a big link section..
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists