[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205211954340.13522@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Sorry, got it... CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled below...
>
> pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301
> Dentry cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 5, 2097152 bytes)
> Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 4, 1048576 bytes)
> Mount-cache hash table entries: 4096
> Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
> Initializing cgroup subsys devices
> Initializing cgroup subsys freezer
> POWER7 performance monitor hardware support registered
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at /scratch/mikey/src/linux-next/include/linux/gfp.h:318!
Yeah, this is what I was expecting, it's tripping on
VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(nid));
and slub won't pass nid < 0. You're sure my patch is applied? :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists