[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120522130354.fdb335eb294f4206b4b2fed5@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:03:54 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
Hi David,
On Mon, 21 May 2012 18:53:37 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, it's sched/numa since that's what introduced numa_init(). It does
> for_each_node() for each node and does a kmalloc_node() even though that
> node may not be online. Slub ends up passing this node to the page
> allocator through alloc_pages_exact_node(). CONFIG_DEBUG_VM would have
> caught this and your config confirms its not enabled.
>
> sched/numa either needs a memory hotplug notifier or it needs to pass
> NUMA_NO_NODE for nodes that aren't online. Until we get the former, the
> following should fix it.
>
>
> sched, numa: Allocate node_queue on any node for offline nodes
>
> struct node_queue must be allocated with NUMA_NO_NODE for nodes that are
> not (yet) online, otherwise the page allocator has a bad zonelist.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Thanks, that fixes it.
Tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists