[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337763574_198483@CP5-2952>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:59:23 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: Regression on GMA965 - display seems to have slow jump changes in brightness
On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:59:07 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com> wrote:
> 2012/5/23 Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>:
> > Hmm, seems like your display doesn't like to be downclocked, or rather
> > you don't like it to be downclocked :) The reason this patch triggered
> > it is because it does a better job of finding a compatible clock. You
> > can disable lvds downclocking on the kernel command line by setting
> > i915.lvds_downclock=0
> >
>
> Hmm I've been using i915.lvds_downclock=1 on grub command line, and
> haven't noticed any visible problems with 3.3 kernel. So I'd rather
> ask if the problematic patch isn't doing downclocking in a wrong way?
> Or maybe detection that downclocking is not supported properly is not
> correct now ?
It is more likely that we did not detect a downclock mode before now and
so this is the first time that is being used in anger. (There should be
some telltales in drm.debug dmesg) If you are really, really brave you
can try http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/log/?h=fastboot
which only triggers the downclock on a vblank.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists