[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120523091109.GI5062@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:11:09 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: Regression on GMA965 - display seems to have slow jump changes
in brightness
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:07:28AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:59:07AM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> > Hmm I've been using i915.lvds_downclock=1 on grub command line, and
> > haven't noticed any visible problems with 3.3 kernel. So I'd rather
> > ask if the problematic patch isn't doing downclocking in a wrong way?
> > Or maybe detection that downclocking is not supported properly is not
> > correct now ?
>
> Nope, Sean's analysis is pretty much correct, that patch only makes
> downclocking possible in more circumstances. And downclocking can
> certainly explain what you're seeing, the backlight pwm signal is driven
> off the panel dotclock, so if we change that we can very likely cause some
> funny interference. I guess we could frob the backligth control settings
> and adjust them for the change in clockspeed, but the current backlight
> code is a bit a mess. So right now I suggest you just drop that option -
> there are reasons it's not the default ;-)
Quick question: What's the frequency of the brightness change? And how
regular are the changes?
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@...ll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists