[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1xoqff_OQORFm05fCqeZ-vCt+2Y9H0KNfSxrCepfCDNGZgXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:54:14 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-3.5/core] blkcg: tg_stats_alloc_lock is an irq lock
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> tg_stats_alloc_lock nests inside queue lock and should always be held
> with irq disabled. throtl_pd_{init|exit}() were using non-irqsafe
> spinlock ops which triggered inverse lock ordering via irq warning via
> RCU freeing of blkg invoking throtl_pd_exit() w/o disabling IRQ.
>
> Update both functions to use irq safe operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
> LKML-Reference: <1335339396.16988.80.camel@...py>
> ---
I think that this patch got lost somewhere and never got merged into
the for-3.5 branch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists