[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF1ivSa_Hz30mRXDmOAXuvOORAn8mA20XgoAouYoMysEXcwHpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 23:53:42 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4]: block layer runtime pm
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012, Lin Ming wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about "Runtime PM and the block
>>> layer". http://marc.info/?t=128259108400001&r=1&w=2
>>>
>>> Here are the RFC v3 patches that try to implement the ideas discussed.
>>> Welcome to give it a try.
>>
>> Have you checked to make sure these changes won't break the IDE driver?
>> Maybe it will need to set the REQ_PM flag too.
REQ_PM flag is about runtime PM, but IDE driver does not support
runtime PM at all.
# grep runtime drivers/ide/*.c
This gets empty result.
So I think it won't break the IDE driver.
Thanks,
Lin Ming
>
> Will check it.
>
> Another thing need to check is if system suspend/resume works.
>
>>
>> Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists