[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF1ivSbVHUgauQHBRm9Cyo_Fm3gQ0W+R_fQ6gQHAY6B=Q4WsRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 23:35:56 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] block: add a flag to identify PM request
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012, Lin Ming wrote:
>
>> Add a flag REQ_PM to identify the request is PM related.
>> As an example, modify scsi code to use this flag.
>
> Don't forget to check up on the SCSI error handler. If I'm not
> mistaken, the libata drivers use it during suspend and resume. Also,
You are right.
ata_port_suspend_common
ata_port_request_pm
ata_port_schedule_eh
scsi_schedule_eh
scsi_error_handler ---> libata error handler
I just have a quick look and it seems libata error handler does not
send SCSI request.
Will check more.
> the error handler will run if one of the REQ_PM commands encounters an
> error.
>
> Therefore it seems likely that every request submitted by the error
> handler needs to have REQ_PM set.
>
> Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists