[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx_e6hS0F++kkNj9uDr-qtr-DE_R25Owb80DyZN+xixDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:57:47 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, frank.arnold@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mce] x86/bitops: Move BIT_64() for a wider use
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> How about the following completely untested chunk:
No, you can't do that. All standard C operations will return *one*
type. That very much includes the ternary ?: operator.
The *only* ways I know of to get two types are
- C preprocessor stuff, ie
#define BIT(x) __BIT_##x
and then just enumerate all the 64 cases. This is portable, but it gets old.
- using __builtin_choose_expr(), which actually allows the two
expressions to have different types, but requires a very strict
compile-time constant (ie you cannot rely on the optimizer making it a
constant - because it needs to choose the expression before the
optimizer runs)
There might be some other magic gcc extension, of course.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists