[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANQmPXj6oa_bFCS2tST8=GzanrFUnD7nKDROb04K-9iJC7tZQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 23:48:37 +0800
From: Chen <hi3766691@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 10:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, we can rebase the whole branch and get rid of this one and
>>> of the merge commit it has.
>>
>> I took it, but it was really unnecessary.
>>
>> There were printk() patches in the queue and being discussed that
>> needed this, but I wouldn't have pulled the end result if they hadn't
>> been fixed.
>>
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> Just for clarification - do you want the patch reverted? My reading of
> what you wrote (as well as of the patch) is that it was an unnecessary
> (redundant) patch, but Ingo is worried that you are saying it is incorrect.
>
> -hpa
>
> --
> H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Really redundant.The author is just re-implement the same
things.(Seems he disnt know that this is already implement.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists