linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANQmPXgxT3rvgGCOjztuGCTkgf4aa2-5a5q6K-8xPR1EcAsdgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2012 23:54:07 +0800
From:	Chen <hi3766691@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:31 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just for clarification - do you want the patch reverted?  My reading of
>> what you wrote (as well as of the patch) is that it was an unnecessary
>> (redundant) patch, but Ingo is worried that you are saying it is incorrect.
>
> It's not technically incorrect, it was just unnecessary.
>
>                   Linus
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Everyone knows that this patch had been unstable. Also, too much code
are pushed into printk() with the patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/