[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxw0HRpizzJZxhhA2oqPpzg4DPUvH2r7YoYfctXS6K=WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:33:49 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] Input updates for 3.5-rc0
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> to receive updates for the input subsystem. You will get:
I get an annoying conflict, and the reason I call it annoying is not
because it's hard to resolve, it's because doing that shows that you
seem to have preferred using
dev_dbg(&input->dev.parent, ...)
over the much more natural
dev_dbg(&input->dev, ...)
which would seem to make more sense.
Why? Are the input layer device names so bad that using them for debug
output is useless? And if so, why *are* they so bad?
I'm going to take your version over Greg's more straightforward one,
because I assume Greg did things a bit more mindlessly and I think you
presumably had a *reason* for your extra (stupid) ".parent" part. But
I'm unhappy with it, because I suspect the reason you did that implies
that the input layer does something bad.
Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists