[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBF3561.4040805@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:31:45 +0800
From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tony.luck@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86: mce: Implement cmci poll mode for intel machines
δΊ 2012/5/25 14:24, Borislav Petkov ει:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:54:52PM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Intentionally left blank to be filled out by someone who wants
>> that and can explain the reason for this better than me.
>
> That'll be Intel folk :)
>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Looks good to me too, thanks Thomas for doing this!
>
> I'll run it next week just in case.
>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
>
Oh, Oh, wait. First I need to thank Thomas to improve it. I don't
reply you at the first time because I have some thoughts and now
I'm testing it. The basic test shows it hangs the system after
sb_edac is removed and when error count increases to the threshold
it hangs again, and when trying to reboot the system no hang happnes
(not reach the threshold) the system oops. I need to time to debug
and give the valid feedback. Please be patient :-). Of course,
I still need time to add some description for Thomas ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists