[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1205251119390.3231@ionos>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:20:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tony.luck@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86: mce: Implement cmci poll mode for intel
machines
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Chen Gong wrote:
> δΊ 2012/5/25 14:24, Borislav Petkov ει:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:54:52PM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> Intentionally left blank to be filled out by someone who wants
> >> that and can explain the reason for this better than me.
> >
> > That'll be Intel folk :)
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >
> > Looks good to me too, thanks Thomas for doing this!
> >
> > I'll run it next week just in case.
> >
> > Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
> >
>
> Oh, Oh, wait. First I need to thank Thomas to improve it. I don't
> reply you at the first time because I have some thoughts and now
> I'm testing it. The basic test shows it hangs the system after
> sb_edac is removed and when error count increases to the threshold
> it hangs again, and when trying to reboot the system no hang happnes
> (not reach the threshold) the system oops. I need to time to debug
> and give the valid feedback. Please be patient :-). Of course,
As I said it's completely untested. I just made sure it compiles :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists