[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337938798.9783.172.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:39:58 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched/rt: Remove redundant check before
push_rt_task()
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 15:43 +0900, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
>
> Currently rq->rt.overloaded is checked twice in switched_to_rt().
> Remove the first one which out of push_rt_task().
Steven was this on purpose to avoid the call or can I apply this thing?
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/rt.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index c5565c3..a601a70 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -1907,7 +1907,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> */
> if (p->on_rq && rq->curr != p) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - if (rq->rt.overloaded && push_rt_task(rq) &&
> + if (push_rt_task(rq) &&
> /* Don't resched if we changed runqueues */
> rq != task_rq(p))
> check_resched = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists