linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched/rt: Remove redundant check before push_rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1337951322.13348.246.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 May 2012 09:08:42 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched/rt: Remove redundant check before
 push_rt_task()

On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 11:39 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 15:43 +0900, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> > From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
> > 
> > Currently rq->rt.overloaded is checked twice in switched_to_rt().
> > Remove the first one which out of push_rt_task().
> 
> Steven was this on purpose to avoid the call or can I apply this thing?
> 

Yeah, I think I added that as a way to avoid the call, but I never did
any benchmarks to see if it was actually better (extra check to avoid
the call, or just do the call and remove the duplicate check).

It would be a good idea to see how ofter that check happens in the real
world. As two or more RT tasks on the same CPU is only something that
happens on a real RT system (as the common case that is).

It's a micro optimization, as a double duplicate check should be fast as
everything is nicely in the cache line. But an extra call may be
expensive. But it's not a big difference to me if you take the patch or
not.

> > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/rt.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> > index c5565c3..a601a70 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> > @@ -1907,7 +1907,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (p->on_rq && rq->curr != p) {
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > -		if (rq->rt.overloaded && push_rt_task(rq) &&
> > +		if (push_rt_task(rq) &&
> >  		    /* Don't resched if we changed runqueues */
> >  		    rq != task_rq(p))

If you decide to take this patch, it may be better to switch it to:

		/* Don't resched if we changed runqueues */
		if (push_rt_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p))

-- Steve



> >  			check_resched = 0;
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/