[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBF77BF.1040304@hitachi.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 May 2012 21:14:55 +0900
From:	YOSHIDA Masanori <masanori.yoshida.tv@...achi.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@....edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4 V2] livedump: Add notifier-call-chain into do_page_fault
Hi, Peter,
I agree that notifier isn't suitable for this purpose.
In the next version, I plan to replace this with a simple
callback as follows.
   if (very_unlikely(under_live_dump))
       ...
In addition to this, since PF handler is a very hot path,
I will cover the condition with "#ifdef CONFIG_WRPROTECT".
Thank you.
On 2012/05/25 18:19, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 18:12 +0900, YOSHIDA Masanori wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds notifier-call-chain that is called in do_page_fault.
>> Livedump uses this to check if page fault is caused by livedump, and if so,
>> the fault is handled by livedump's handler function. Otherwise, it is
>> handled by the original page fault handler.
>
> No, please no notifiers..
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
