[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120604210912.GA18354@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:09:12 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: YOSHIDA Masanori <masanori.yoshida.tv@...achi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@....edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4 V2] introduce: livedump
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 06:12:07PM +0900, YOSHIDA Masanori wrote:
[..]
> (4) It allocates about 50% of physical RAM to store dumped pages. Currently
> Live Dump saves all dumped data on memory once, and after that a user
> becomes able to use the dumped data. Live Dump itself has no feature to
> save dumped data onto a disk or any other storage device.
People complain when kdump reserves 128M of memory when system crashes.
I am skeptical that reserving 50% of memory for livedumps is going to fly.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists