lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC8teKXAEoZtD9690myPOVTHCetSQMmKOxEtL_oLL3Af0b1E8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 May 2012 14:11:26 +0800
From:	Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@...il.com>
To:	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Andre Nathan <andre@...irati.com.br>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: About cgroup memory limits

2012/5/25 Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>:
> (2012/05/25 13:16), Zhu Yanhai wrote:
>>
>> 2012/5/10 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>:
>>>
>>> (2012/05/10 3:37), Andre Nathan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> I'm doing some tests with LXC and how it interacts with the memory
>>>> cgroup limits, more specifically the memory.limit_in_bytes control file.
>>>>
>>>> Am I correct in my understanding of the memory cgroup documentation[1]
>>>> that the limit set in memory.limit_in_bytes is applied to the sum of the
>>>> fields 'cache', 'rss' and 'mapped_file' in the memory.stat file?
>>>>
>>>
>>> cache includes mapped_file. Then,
>>
>>
>> Excuse me, but it does read:
>>
>>        switch (ctype) {
>>        case MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE:
>>        case MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SHMEM:
>>                SetPageCgroupCache(pc);
>>                SetPageCgroupUsed(pc);
>>                break;
>>        case MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED:
>>                ClearPageCgroupCache(pc);
>>                SetPageCgroupUsed(pc);
>>                break;
>>        default:
>>                break;
>>        }
>>        mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(mem, pc, page_size);
>>
>> And then, in    mem_cgroup_charge_statistics() we have :
>>
>>        if (PageCgroupCache(pc))
>>                __mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(cpustat,
>>                        MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE, numpages);
>>        else
>>                __mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(cpustat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS,
>>                        numpages);
>>
>> So it seems that rss includes mapped_file, not cache?
>>
> Why you think so ? mapped_file is mapped file cache. All file caches
> are accountned as STAT_CACHE.
>
>
> TYPE_MAPPDED doesn't mean mapped_file.
> In above, TYPE_MAPPED is called via anonymous page fault.
> It represents anonymous page, counted as RSS.
> I wonder it may be better to rename these macros.

Got it, really get confused by the name! Thanks.
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ