[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337926468.5415.48.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 08:14:28 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] select_idle_sibling() inducing bouncing on westmere
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 15:20 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 15:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > For power7 with 4 smt it would end up as 1230 I guess.
>
> One more thing, in light of that, can't you simplify the core stuff to
> be a simple shift as well? map them 123450, does it really matter to
> pair them off like 103254 ?
In my head it does. Buddies need to be glued together so we can use
them as a team to convert overlap and kick butt on ramp up.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists