linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] STA2X11 CAN: CAN driver for the STA2X11 board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 26 May 2012 10:36:10 +0200
From:	Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...il.com>
To:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Cc:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Giancarlo Asnaghi <giancarlo.asnaghi@...com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] STA2X11 CAN: CAN driver for the STA2X11 board

> Thanks for your contribution. At a first glance, this driver looks
> similar to the pch_can and the c_can driver. It seems that a C_CAN based
> controller is used on that board as well. If that's true, it should be
> handled by the C_CAN driver. To get ride of the obsolete pch_can driver,
> I sent some time ago the patch "[RFC/PATCH] c_can: add driver for the
> PCH CAN controller":
>
>  http://marc.info/?t=132991563600003&r=1&w=4
>
> I could serve as base of a generic c_can_pci driver.

You are right, this is a C-CAN but it isn't specified on the board manual.
I compared the board manual with the Bosch C-CAN manual, and it is the same.
I'm working on a PCI module for this board, when it is ready we can think for
a generic c_can_pci

Thank you

-- 
Federico Vaga
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/