[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB5E581.1090209@grandegger.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 08:00:33 +0200
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...il.com>
CC: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Giancarlo Asnaghi <giancarlo.asnaghi@...com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] STA2X11 CAN: CAN driver for the STA2X11 board
On 05/17/2012 10:59 PM, Federico Vaga wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Giancarlo Asnaghi <giancarlo.asnaghi@...com>
> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/net/can/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/net/can/sta2x11_can.c | 1085 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 1097 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/sta2x11_can.c
Thanks for your contribution. At a first glance, this driver looks
similar to the pch_can and the c_can driver. It seems that a C_CAN based
controller is used on that board as well. If that's true, it should be
handled by the C_CAN driver. To get ride of the obsolete pch_can driver,
I sent some time ago the patch "[RFC/PATCH] c_can: add driver for the
PCH CAN controller":
http://marc.info/?t=132991563600003&r=1&w=4
I could serve as base of a generic c_can_pci driver.
Wolfgang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists