[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC3504B.7000903@panasas.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 13:15:39 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org>,
<dm-devel@...hat.com>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<tj@...nel.org>, <axboe@...nel.dk>, <agk@...hat.com>,
<neilb@...e.de>, <drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com>, <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
<mpatocka@...hat.com>, <sage@...dream.net>,
<yehuda@...newdream.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/16] block: Rename bio_split() -> bio_pair_split()
On 05/25/2012 11:25 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> This is prep work for introducing a more general bio_split()
>
> Change-Id: Ib9c4ff691af889d26bc9ec9fb42a2f3068f34ad9
>
Since these patches will go through Jens tree this kind of
comment can *never* be true/correct. And it is plenty unwanted
for sure.
Here:
bio_do means an operation on bio. But here we are actually operating
on a bio_pair. So rename it it to bio_pair_do.
We will later introduce a real bio_split() function that receives
a bio and splits it.
Or something like that.
Thanks
Boaz
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
<snip>
> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ struct bio_pair {
> atomic_t cnt;
> int error;
> };
> -extern struct bio_pair *bio_split(struct bio *bi, int first_sectors);
> +extern struct bio_pair *bio_pair_split(struct bio *bi, int first_sectors);
> extern void bio_pair_release(struct bio_pair *dbio);
>
> extern struct bio_set *bioset_create(unsigned int, unsigned int);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists