[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC47DFE.8020004@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 15:42:54 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, borislav.petkov@....com,
tony.luck@...el.com, luto@....edu, jbeulich@...e.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, akinobu.mita@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tlb: replace INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR by CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR
On 05/25/2012 10:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:07 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>> /*
>> - *
>> - * The flush IPI assumes that a thread switch happens in this order:
>> - * [cpu0: the cpu that switches]
>> - * 1) switch_mm() either 1a) or 1b)
>> - * 1a) thread switch to a different mm
>> - * 1a1) cpu_clear(cpu, old_mm->cpu_vm_mask);
>> - * Stop ipi delivery for the old mm. This is not synchronized with
>> - * the other cpus, but smp_invalidate_interrupt ignore flush ipis
>> - * for the wrong mm, and in the worst case we perform a superfluous
>> - * tlb flush.
>> - * 1a2) set cpu mmu_state to TLBSTATE_OK
>> - * Now the smp_invalidate_interrupt won't call leave_mm if cpu0
>> - * was in lazy tlb mode.
>> - * 1a3) update cpu active_mm
>> - * Now cpu0 accepts tlb flushes for the new mm.
>> - * 1a4) cpu_set(cpu, new_mm->cpu_vm_mask);
>> - * Now the other cpus will send tlb flush ipis.
>> - * 1a4) change cr3.
>> - * 1b) thread switch without mm change
>> - * cpu active_mm is correct, cpu0 already handles
>> - * flush ipis.
>> - * 1b1) set cpu mmu_state to TLBSTATE_OK
>> - * 1b2) test_and_set the cpu bit in cpu_vm_mask.
>> - * Atomically set the bit [other cpus will start sending flush ipis],
>> - * and test the bit.
>> - * 1b3) if the bit was 0: leave_mm was called, flush the tlb.
>> - * 2) switch %%esp, ie current
>> - *
>> - * The interrupt must handle 2 special cases:
>> - * - cr3 is changed before %%esp, ie. it cannot use current->{active_,}mm.
>> - * - the cpu performs speculative tlb reads, i.e. even if the cpu only
>> - * runs in kernel space, the cpu could load tlb entries for user space
>> - * pages.
>> - *
>> - * The good news is that cpu mmu_state is local to each cpu, no
>> - * write/read ordering problems.
>> - */
>
> It would be nice to update that comment instead of removing it.
>
How about the following new comments? I changed them to match latest
switch_mm and tlbflush code.
but as to the 'The interrupt must handle 2 special cases' section, I am
wondering if it should be kept, since current tlb flush IPI handler
don't need %%esp at all.
Comments welcome!
-------
/*
* The flush IPI assumes that a thread switch happens in this order:
* [cpu0: the cpu that switches]
* 1) switch_mm() either 1a) or 1b)
* 1a) thread switch to a different mm
* 1a1) set cpu_tlbstate to TLBSTATE_OK
* Now the tlb flush IPI handler flush_tlb_func won't call leave_mm
* if cpu0 was in lazy tlb mode.
* 1a2) update cpu active_mm
* Now cpu0 accepts tlb flushes for the new mm.
* 1a3) cpu_set(cpu, new_mm->cpu_vm_mask);
* Now the other cpus will send tlb flush ipis.
* 1a4) change cr3.
* 1a5) cpu_clear(cpu, old_mm->cpu_vm_mask);
* Stop ipi delivery for the old mm. This is not synchronized with
* the other cpus, but flush_tlb_func ignore flush ipis for the wrong
* mm, and in the worst case we perform a superfluous tlb flush.
* 1b) thread switch without mm change
* cpu active_mm is correct, cpu0 already handles
* flush ipis.
* 1b1) set cpu_tlbstate to TLBSTATE_OK
* 1b2) test_and_set the cpu bit in cpu_vm_mask.
* Atomically set the bit [other cpus will start sending flush ipis],
* and test the bit.
* 1b3) if the bit was 0: leave_mm was called, flush the tlb.
* 2) switch %%esp, ie current
*
* The interrupt must handle 2 special cases:
* - cr3 is changed before %%esp, ie. it cannot use current->{active_,}mm.
* - the cpu performs speculative tlb reads, i.e. even if the cpu only
* runs in kernel space, the cpu could load tlb entries for user space
* pages.
*
* The good news is that cpu_tlbstate is local to each cpu, no
* write/read ordering problems.
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists