[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120530150520.GC15438@x1.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:05:20 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, jeremy@...p.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/amd: fix crash as Xen Dom0 on AMD Trinity systems
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:01:19AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> I'm not following: If the AMD variants (putting a special value into
> >> %edi) can be freely replaced by the non-AMD variants, why did
> >> the AMD special ones get used in the first place?
>
> > Older CPUs (K8) needed the AMD variants, starting with family 10h we
> > can use the normal versions.
>
> So no, not correct.
I don't see what the problem is: the amd* variants shouldn't have been
used at all in the first place. Fullstop. The patch should've been doing
*msrl_safe from the get-go. Regardless of family.
So what's the issue?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists