[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC6C111.2060108@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:53:37 +0900
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>, hannes@...xchg.org,
mhocko@...e.cz, bsingharora@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] meminfo: show /proc/meminfo base on container's memcg
(2012/05/31 9:44), David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>
>> My test with sysfs node's meminfo seems to work...
>>
>> [root@...00-1 qqm]# mount --bind /sys/devices/system/node/node0/meminfo
>> /proc/meminfo
>> [root@...00-1 qqm]# cat /proc/meminfo
>>
>> Node 0 MemTotal: 8379636 kB
>
> This doesn't seem like a good idea unless the application supports the
> "Node 0" prefix in /proc/meminfo.
>
Of course, /cgroup/memory/..../memory.meminfo , a new file, will use the same
format of /proc/meminfo. Above is just an example of bind-mount.
> If any application really cares about the amount of memory available to
> it, it should be taught to be memcg aware. Then do something like
>
Considering the container as a kind of virtualization, Some kind of
transparent way is required.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists