[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120531005607.GB11775@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 01:56:07 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: fix IMA lockdep circular locking dependency
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 05:40:54PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I think it's cleaner to take the whole thing into an inlined helper.
>
> Even better.
>
> I notice that your inlined helper doesn't do what I did: if PROT_EXEC
> is already set, stop all the stupid games. IOW, the first test in that
> function could as well be
>
> if (prot & (PROT_READ | PROT_EXEC) != PROT_READ)
> return prot;
>
> because if PROT_EXEC is already set, or if PROT_READ wasn't set, none
> of the rest of the checks make any sense at all.
Point... OK, done, pushed and the whole thing thrown into #for-next.
Probably too late for today's linux-next, but tomorrow one should pick
that. BTW, tomorrow there'll be a signal.git pull request as well,
with task_work_add() series in it.
Now for the Miklos' stuff...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists