[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120531124845.GA5844@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:48:45 +0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
Cc: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.braunstorfinger@...de-schwarz.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add new NRP power meter USB device driver
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:32:40PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012, 14:04:11 schrieben Sie:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:17:11PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012, 11:53:04 schrieb Greg KH:
> > > > > So it is a chicken and egg problem. A lot of software is now out with
> > > > > depends on this driver and a lot of embedded development environments
> > > > > doesn't provide libudev, libsysfs und libusb. It will also increase the
> > > > > size of the image and adds additional dependencies to the application.
> > > >
> > > > You don't need any of those libraries to do this. What's wrong with
> > > > using "raw" usbfs interactions?
> > >
> > > SPI is not limited to USB. If we can get a unified subsystem then the
> > > drivers need to be in kernel space, as some hardware does not allow
> > > a solution in user space.
> >
> > Ok, now that is a valid reason for a kernel driver.
> >
> > But, I think it should use the IIO interface, as that should handle
> > these types of devices.
>
> Bad gamble for the future. We will end up with an interface which
> would not be implementable.
Why do you say that? What's wrong with IIO?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists